At my place of work, we have a lot of TV's for our customers to watch. Generally we tend to have music channels on most of the time. The other day a customer of about 50 or so years asked me if we could turn off the sex film that was showing and pointed at the video that was playing (Leaving by Jesse McCartney, which isn't necessarily that raunchy).
The lady stated that she didn't think it was appropriate for her husband to see girls walking around in their underwear. Whilst I think this woman was being a bit overly protective (if that's the word) of her husband's ability to cope with half naked women on the TV, it did get me thinking about a lot of the videos that are regularly being shown on music channels which are seemingly not governed by a "watershed" (i.e. showing certain things after certain times so that children can't see them etc).
It seems to me that there is a growing trend to show overtly sexual dance moves and women in their underwear for no other reason than to help sell the track. And although that is the main reason for the video in the first place, at what point do we cross the line of these videos actually turning into porn.
In my mind this trend seems to have come from the video for Eric Prydz "Call On Me" where a lot of women were shown to be working out in a gym, and being very sexual in their moves. The video was a huge success and was talked about a lot (well I knew loads of people that discussed it at length!) Now it seems that virtually any kind of Dance track is accompanied by women dancing very provocatively in little more than their underwear and lots of gratuitous shots of cleavage and backsides. Here are a couple of examples: (because of the nature of these videos you may have to be a member to watch them as some of them are rated as suitable only for over 18s!)
The last video of H2O ft Platinum "What's it Going To Be" even shows girls dressed in school uniform undressing down to their underwear, which in my mind is completely paedophillic heaven! (The girls are well over 18 but the connotation is still there!)
I expect I maybe coming off a bit prudish here, but I am totally not, and until this lady remarked on it I hadn't really noticed how provocative videos can be.
Is it possible that they are so commonplace in so many peoples lives that we hardly notice them in a way that we would notice the actors in Eastenders running around Albert Square in their underwear (for example)? When do we say "You know what? This is not something I would want my child to see?" Is it downright seedy, purposefully controversial, degrading to women or just harmless fun?
What are your thoughts?
The lady stated that she didn't think it was appropriate for her husband to see girls walking around in their underwear. Whilst I think this woman was being a bit overly protective (if that's the word) of her husband's ability to cope with half naked women on the TV, it did get me thinking about a lot of the videos that are regularly being shown on music channels which are seemingly not governed by a "watershed" (i.e. showing certain things after certain times so that children can't see them etc).
It seems to me that there is a growing trend to show overtly sexual dance moves and women in their underwear for no other reason than to help sell the track. And although that is the main reason for the video in the first place, at what point do we cross the line of these videos actually turning into porn.
In my mind this trend seems to have come from the video for Eric Prydz "Call On Me" where a lot of women were shown to be working out in a gym, and being very sexual in their moves. The video was a huge success and was talked about a lot (well I knew loads of people that discussed it at length!) Now it seems that virtually any kind of Dance track is accompanied by women dancing very provocatively in little more than their underwear and lots of gratuitous shots of cleavage and backsides. Here are a couple of examples: (because of the nature of these videos you may have to be a member to watch them as some of them are rated as suitable only for over 18s!)
The last video of H2O ft Platinum "What's it Going To Be" even shows girls dressed in school uniform undressing down to their underwear, which in my mind is completely paedophillic heaven! (The girls are well over 18 but the connotation is still there!)
I expect I maybe coming off a bit prudish here, but I am totally not, and until this lady remarked on it I hadn't really noticed how provocative videos can be.
Is it possible that they are so commonplace in so many peoples lives that we hardly notice them in a way that we would notice the actors in Eastenders running around Albert Square in their underwear (for example)? When do we say "You know what? This is not something I would want my child to see?" Is it downright seedy, purposefully controversial, degrading to women or just harmless fun?
What are your thoughts?
Comment