Darla: What we once were informs all that we have become. The same love will infect our hearts, even if they no longer beat. Simple death won't change that.
I was looking up Darla’s appearances and was surprised to see that she only appeared three times in Angel’s first season. Her first appearance in Angel comes in The Prodigal. And it feels like a transformative moment. Not just for the Angel/Darla arc that would come to define the next two seasons, but for the Buffyverse as a whole.
It begins – much as Welcome to the Hellmouth did – with a reversal of expectations. When we see Liam sticking to the shadows, asking the servant for an invitation, we assume that this is the mighty and powerful Angelus out to make an early kill. But then his father appears and pushes the very much human Liam into the daylight. The Buffyverse began with a reversal of the horror trope where the scared blonde girl turns out to be the monster. Here, the monster is still but a boorish lout.
The episode works with the tropes of Angel’s first season. There are PI investigations, there are elements of film noir. Hidden sin works within film noir as much as it does the backstory of any vampire on a quest for redemption. But this episode also takes the anthology-like aspect of the detective show and turns it personal. It is about the main character and the main recurring character’s relationships with their parents.
And in a way, it’s a handoff between Angel’s potential Buffy-replacements. I like the character of Kate Lockley quite a bit, but I don’t think we would have ever have truly accepted her as a substitute for Buffy – the next girl. This episode cements that it would be ill-advised to take the Angel and Kate relationship in that direction. Instead we see once again Darla’s influence on Angel. Darla isn’t the woman-after-Buffy. She’s the woman before Buffy. She’s tied in with his sense of guilt and need for redemption.
And while there have certainly been hints in Buffy and Angel before this (Harmony certainly seems little different dead or undead), it’s this episode that strongly ties the vampire’s darker personality into their moral life. Angel is shaped by what happened to him in life, just as we’ll see that Spike is shaped by his experiences next year.
Do you also think this episode is a standout of Angel’s first season?
P.S.: Angel tells Kate's father that he doesn't have kids. The answer is both true and false. He's not going to reveal his complicated background of being a sire or grandsire. But even if Angelus's deeds are shaped by his mortal life, as a soulless vampire could Angelus ever truly be a father to Dru or Spike or Penn?
I was looking up Darla’s appearances and was surprised to see that she only appeared three times in Angel’s first season. Her first appearance in Angel comes in The Prodigal. And it feels like a transformative moment. Not just for the Angel/Darla arc that would come to define the next two seasons, but for the Buffyverse as a whole.
It begins – much as Welcome to the Hellmouth did – with a reversal of expectations. When we see Liam sticking to the shadows, asking the servant for an invitation, we assume that this is the mighty and powerful Angelus out to make an early kill. But then his father appears and pushes the very much human Liam into the daylight. The Buffyverse began with a reversal of the horror trope where the scared blonde girl turns out to be the monster. Here, the monster is still but a boorish lout.
The episode works with the tropes of Angel’s first season. There are PI investigations, there are elements of film noir. Hidden sin works within film noir as much as it does the backstory of any vampire on a quest for redemption. But this episode also takes the anthology-like aspect of the detective show and turns it personal. It is about the main character and the main recurring character’s relationships with their parents.
And in a way, it’s a handoff between Angel’s potential Buffy-replacements. I like the character of Kate Lockley quite a bit, but I don’t think we would have ever have truly accepted her as a substitute for Buffy – the next girl. This episode cements that it would be ill-advised to take the Angel and Kate relationship in that direction. Instead we see once again Darla’s influence on Angel. Darla isn’t the woman-after-Buffy. She’s the woman before Buffy. She’s tied in with his sense of guilt and need for redemption.
And while there have certainly been hints in Buffy and Angel before this (Harmony certainly seems little different dead or undead), it’s this episode that strongly ties the vampire’s darker personality into their moral life. Angel is shaped by what happened to him in life, just as we’ll see that Spike is shaped by his experiences next year.
Do you also think this episode is a standout of Angel’s first season?
P.S.: Angel tells Kate's father that he doesn't have kids. The answer is both true and false. He's not going to reveal his complicated background of being a sire or grandsire. But even if Angelus's deeds are shaped by his mortal life, as a soulless vampire could Angelus ever truly be a father to Dru or Spike or Penn?
Comment