PDA

View Full Version : Being a good father vs your believings.


Nina
12-08-08, 12:01 AM
It's probably asked before, but what would you've done when you was Angel. He had to choose between saving his son and giving up his freedom and the freedom of his friends or giving his son up.

Let's all hope that not one of us will ever be in that position, but what if you was ...


I'm sure that I would have chosen for my child. I believe that being a good parent is linked to being a good person. Which is my #1 priority. It's of course a bad choice, but on that moment you knew that your child would die when you wouldn't choose him while you can have the (naive) hope that it won't be that bad when you take over W&H.

Emmie
12-08-08, 10:34 AM
I would choose my child. Angel sacrificed himself in order to give Connor a better life.

As for Angel being responsible for his friends, Gunn had already decided to take the deal and Wesley was certainly acting like he might be open to it when Angel came in and said he'd made an "executive decision" to take the deal. Lorne then went on to congratulate Angel for being all "all growed up." Fred was the only one who showed serious hesitation at the W&H offer. Oh, poor Fred.

Though Angel making an "executive decision" doesn't take away Fred or Wes' free will to disagree or walk away. I think Gunn and Lorne were on board regardless of Angel's decision, but Fred and Wesley would have followed Angel's lead.

Still in the end, Angel was faced with the decision of certain pain, suffering and eventual death for Connor or a "deal with the devil" where he stood a fighting chance. After the events of season 4, I believe Angel was so defeated that he'd lost hope for himself. The only bright spot in his life was the belief that Connor would live. I think Angel at that point believed he was damned and the only hope he had for the future was Connor. That's the legacy for a lot of parents, wanting the best for their children.

I don't fault Angel for his decision. The part I question - was Angel responsible for the rest of his team agreeing to work for W&H? Is he culpable for this decision because of the mindwipe spell that skewed their memories of the past at the exact moment prior to their deciding to join W&H?

sueworld
12-08-08, 10:56 AM
It's a difficult one this. On one hand I can understand Angels anguish and desire for the best for his son, but to basically make a pact with the devil and for all intensive purposes 'sell' your friends souls off to a third party without their real knowledge is a bit dodgy at best. I mean where do you draw the line?

He took away/altered their memories which I do think is unforgivable really whatever the circumstances.

As I said I more then understand why he did it, but I can also sympathise with the likes of poor Wesley who felt so confused and betrayed when the spell was broken.

Nina
12-08-08, 11:22 AM
Illyria and Wesley talk about this in 'Origin'.

ILLYRIA
Do you? There are 2 sets of memories—those that happened and those that are fabricated. It's hard to tell which is which.

WESLEY
(looks confused, shakes his head)
Try to push reality out of your mind. Focus on the other memories. They were created for a reason.

ILLYRIA
To hide from the truth?

WESLEY
(looks pained, looks into Illyria's eyes)
To endure it.

Somehow, I think that Wesley is grateful. Somehow and without knowing it, Angel didn't just save Connor ... he also saved Wesley who can deal better with the past now.

That doesn't take away that mindwiping your friends is a really bad thing, or something that you can take lightly.
Why Angel didn't give his friends their memories back, is for me still a big questionmark, I think that they would understand. Maybe the calm and peaceful Wesley made Angel think that they were better without those memories. But still ....

I'm also curious how big the impact was of the loss of those memories for Lorne, Fred and Gunn. Maybe their trust in Wesley would be less strong? But Connor didn't forced those three to change or to develop as a character.

sueworld
12-08-08, 11:28 AM
Poor Angel was stuck in a 'no win' scenario wasn't he really. To make matters this would be Angels only son. Not as If he could create another one sadly, and his love for him must have been immense. He would have done anything to to save him, and by doing what he did to his friends he proved just that.

I don't feel that Wesley finding some kind of twisted peace probaly didn't even come into Angels thinking though. He was too fixated in what he wanted for Connor then to think of what Wesley may or may not need.

Nina
12-08-08, 11:55 AM
I agree about Angel not thinking about Wesley (or any of his friends) at that point in 'Home'. The probems around the mindwipe didn't cross his mind until later I think.

I just watched that scene in 'Home' again, and I don't get the great hate for that episode. The scene between Angel and Connor is amazing and so incredible hard to watch.

sueworld
12-08-08, 12:01 PM
I felt very, very sorry for Angel at that point, and Connor too of course, which is amazing because uptil that point poor Connors character had grated on me somewhat.

Infact I really only got to really like him when he returned in season 5.

Nina
12-08-08, 12:06 PM
Oh me too, I always felt that I had to feel sorry for Connor. But he was so difficult that I was not able too. In 'Home', I felt for him and in season 5 and ATF Connor is incredible sweet and funny ... he is becoming one of my favourites.

I also enjoy Angel and Connor scenes after the mindwipe, Angel seems so happy with Connor around.

NileQT87
12-08-08, 12:07 PM
connor is so massively underappreciated. he's amazing in episodes like a new world (especially all the sunny/angel scenes), benediction (the holtz/angel scenes--the crying), tomorrow (the end), inside out ("you're not my mother!" the darla scene), peace out (talking to cordy), home (the sports store), origin and not fade away.

i feel sorry for the kid all through seasons 3-4. sure, he's healthier in season 5, but his pathos and brainwashing is just as interesting to me.

the fans owe appreciation to vincent kartheiser, imo.

Nina
12-08-08, 02:23 PM
I never blamed VK for my dislike for Connor ... I think that the writers didn't gave him enough good moments. He did hurt Angel so many times. It was just too much. VK shows in 'Mad Men' that he can make a very unlikable character interesting and pretty likable (*). He should've got a Emmy nomination btw, his acting in last weeks episode was pure gold again.


*I'm not the only one who likes Pete ... right?

sueworld
12-08-08, 04:07 PM
Oh I totally agree and VK has just been superb in 'Mad Men'! A great, great show. :D

NileQT87
12-08-08, 04:26 PM
hurting angel isn't a reason to hate a character. then again, i adore holtz, too. hell, i like warren.

because they are really good at playing bastards doesn't make them bad actors or even unlikable, imo. some people are even really good at it and impressive for that reason alone.

not enough moments where he's great? i disagree. i find him fascinating in season 4. he's not there to be liked for his warm fuzzies. he's there to be a source of dark existential and brainwashed pathos and a living result of vengeance. in that regard, vincent was wonderful to watch.

it isn't about 'ew! evil-cordy and connor! gross! oedipus!'... it's about a kid who DIDN'T experience any of that. what the audience is seeing is not what he'd be seeing or even comprehending its existence. at that point, the one person in the world he hadn't been taught to hate was being nice to him and ultimately a being using him for his existential purpose (remember the glowy soul colonic--at lets not forget they were only 17 1/2 and 22-year-olds--not a huge age difference). and can i just mention that i will continue to defend that connor only thought of angel, darla, holtz and justine as his parents. the others were, at best, aunts and uncles he had never known growing up. his impressions of people aren't what the audience saw.

people have trouble getting in his head, i think, even though it's explained quite well what he would know from holtz's parenting. connor was a naive victim.

it's not about who hurts my favorite characters... you can hurt my favorite characters and still be a well-done performance who brings a lot to the show (and doing a thankless job of it).

all the willow/tara fans who pretty much despise warren, for example, even bring their hatred onto adam busch. i've actually seen 'eww's reverberating from that corner of the fandom that childishly cringe at the idea that adam busch and amber benson are together. another example of a thankless acting job of a very talented actor who played a twisted, moody and dark character to much aplomb.

david boreanaz also got a lot of ire for playing another moody, angsty and serious sort of character, same as vincent and adam. there are sections of the fandom who can't stomach that sort of character, and thus, back up their inability to like that necessary character type as an example of bad acting. it's not. it's just not for them... and in many cases, perhaps the actors thanklessly do too good a job at it for them.

Nina
12-08-08, 07:48 PM
In my case it has nothing to do with the actor, I think that VK is one of the best actors in both series. My problem with Connor is also not because I can't deal with dark characters. I could see where he was coming from, I could see the humanity and his trouble ... still I couldn't like him. Why? Because he did hurt Angel so many times ... Holtz, Lindsay etc. are different, Angel didn't love those people and he had not the desire to have a family with those people. Angel never loved anybody more than he loves his son, it's all he has ... the only family he would ever have and he tried so hard to be a good father and we saw Connor turn that down again and again. We saw Angel being hurt time after time. In that case, my sympathy goes to Angel and not to Connor ... and a great performance is what saved Connor from being an unrelatable character, VK gave us the emotions we needed to see Connor as a good person. A bad actor would gave us a flat and mean character without the conflict. I could see the conflicted boy, I could see his point but that couldn't make me like him after everything.


BTW I was never disgusted by Connor/Cordelia because of their age difference, I like Gwen/Connor, I love Buffy/Angel and I'm a supporter of Xander/Dawn ... the Connor/Cordelia thing was so bad (for me) because Cordelia was in love with his father ... and not a season before that we saw her giving Connor a bottle, playing with him and being the closest thing to a mother he had after Darla died. We saw Angel, Cordelia and Connor laying on a bed as a little family. And the fact that Cordelia used Connor didn't help either.

KingofCretins
12-08-08, 09:58 PM
I would choose my child. Angel sacrificed himself in order to give Connor a better life.

Still in the end, Angel was faced with the decision of certain pain, suffering and eventual death for Connor or a "deal with the devil" where he stood a fighting chance. After the events of season 4, I believe Angel was so defeated that he'd lost hope for himself. The only bright spot in his life was the belief that Connor would live. I think Angel at that point believed he was damned and the only hope he had for the future was Connor. That's the legacy for a lot of parents, wanting the best for their children.

I don't fault Angel for his decision. The part I question - was Angel responsible for the rest of his team agreeing to work for W&H? Is he culpable for this decision because of the mindwipe spell that skewed their memories of the past at the exact moment prior to their deciding to join W&H?

Just the thing... Angel didn't just sacrifice himself. Angel sacrificed the free will of everyone that knew about Connor. Did Wes and Gunn and Fred and Lorne still have free will? Sure -- but they no longer had *informed* will. Your raise a question: could the events and history with Connor and everything that had happened given any of them a reason to decide not to go with Angel to Wolfram & Hart? All it has to be is "possible" for it to have been wrong. Besides which, even if they'd gone their own way, they would then either have to get out of the fight altogether or be much less capable of carrying it out -- another choice that Angel would have essentially made for them.

Even Connor's new parents and family -- not every moment of a family's existence is pleasant or happy. Maybe Connor's parents remember a time he was in the hospital for days and they were terrified when he was a baby. Moments like that, life experiences like that, are powerful things, and these people got a lifetime's more worth of them shoved into their heads against their will.

Willow knew about Connor. So did Faith. Their minds also got ravaged of that knowledge without their consent.

And the end result is Angel at Wolfram & Hart -- a situation that led to lots of harm, like the-statistics-name-was-Stacy getting killed when she might not otherwise, or the thousands of dead or enslaved and millions suffering in Hell A as a result of Angel's attempt to extract himself the least effective way possible.

[i]All[/b] back down to a choice he could justify because it was for his son. When is it too far, though?

I agree about Angel not thinking about Wesley (or any of his friends) at that point in 'Home'. The probems around the mindwipe didn't cross his mind until later I think.

I just watched that scene in 'Home' again, and I don't get the great hate for that episode. The scene between Angel and Connor is amazing and so incredible hard to watch.

That scene alone just doesn't save the faulty new direction and bad decisions that set it up.

Angel may not have thought about the implications -- but neither did Willow in "All The Way".

Roses-r-Red
12-08-08, 10:16 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't remember the episode so clearly), but didn't Angel make that deal while Conner was about to blow up a room full of people? I'm not saying that makes Angel's decision the absolute right one, but in the moment, being emotionally drained from the situation with his son, I think Angel made the decision he thought was best. He didn't have the luxury to think things through.

melmel333
12-08-08, 10:40 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't remember the episode so clearly), but didn't Angel make that deal while Conner was about to blow up a room full of people? I'm not saying that makes Angel's decision the absolute right one, but in the moment, being emotionally drained from the situation with his son, I think Angel made the decision he thought was best. He didn't have the luxury to think things through.

i totally agree . he reeeallly didnt have time to think things through
if it wasnt life or death, maybe he wouldve chose differentely .he made the decisions soley around the immediate cirumstances

Vampire in Rug
13-08-08, 03:10 AM
I'd save my son. I don't think I've ever met a parent who wouldn't.

I'm pretty sure Conner and the roomfull of hostages would be grateful for Angel's choice.

Not too sure how I feel about the mindwiping. Assuming that everyone else decided sign on to W&H independantly of the mindwipe, I guess I might be okay with it. I'm pretty sure Gunn and Lorne would have signed on regardless.

I agree that the mindwipe helped Wesley. It erased all the bad blood between him and Angel, gave their friendship a fresh start.

Ehlwyen
18-08-08, 07:45 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't remember the episode so clearly), but didn't Angel make that deal while Conner was about to blow up a room full of people?


I'm pretty sure Conner and the roomfull of hostages would be grateful for Angel's choice.


This is a very important point to consider. If Angel hadn't taken the deal, would he have been able to save all those other lives?

And perhaps, that is the true deciding factor on whether what he did is acceptable. If you believe human life is to be valued and protected at the inconvenience of another, then, yes, Angel made a fair decision.

Personally I'm torn on the whole choice of family or beliefs. For the record, I'm not a parent.

I know I'd expect family to cross a few lines if they could to save me. However, I also strongly believe that sometimes people cannot be saved from themselves no matter how many lines are crossed. So sometimes, you have to let go of the one you love the most for the sake of others you care about.

As far as strictly denying family based on your beliefs being crossed, I don't think it is right to uphold an ideal to spite someone. An ideal will continue exist whether or not you choose to embrace every moment. Indeed, it should be said that compassion and forgiveness of another may possibly be the greatest ideal to uphold.

I hate that Angel had to cross his friends. But he saved lives, including his son (and son's sanity). And in true AtS fashion, it's not about winning every battle, its about living to fight another day.

vampmogs
20-08-08, 01:03 PM
I would have done what Angel did, without a doubt. The only son he could ever have was about to commit suicide and Angel found a way to not only prevent this from happening, but to give him a happier, healthier life. I'm not a father but I suspect that wouldn't be a very hard decision for a lot of parents out there.

I don't view the rest of the team as innocents in all this either. Just like in 'Power play' I think Angel gets all the flack for what really were, team decisions. Sure Angel made an "executive decision" but it was made quite clear that the team were going to take the deal and were far easier seduced than Angel. Angel wanted them to take the tour together, before he could even finish his sentence they high tailed out of there with their respective guides, they all walked to the limo on their own account and we saw them considering (some even blatantly stating) taking the deal before Angel even showed up with Lilah. And given their comments in season five, it's in their belief that they took the deal on their own account. They don't blame Angel and his executive decision, in their eyes it was all their responsibility.

Lets not also forget that it was Team Angel who were all trying to convince him to say in 'You're Welcome' when he wanted to get out of Wolfram and Hart, so they're certainly not all innocent in this.

Angel shouldn't have had them mind wiped (though like Nina I don't believe he took the time to actually understand the gravity of this) there's no excuse for that. But, I don't believe it played any significant part whatsoever in choosing Wolfram and Hart for the team. Not only did they all make their decision and opinions perfectly clear before they lost their memories (presuming the moment Lilah says it has been taken care of) but they were all just as eager to take the tour when they had full knowledge of Connor. His existence played no part in their decision whatsoever, it's irrelevant to everyone but Angel. So regardless of wether they know about Connor or not, it doesn't change their mind in anyway about signing on for Wolfram and Hart.

I actually believe somewhat Angel thought he did have a chance to change Wolfram and Hart. Whilst he was certainly cynical I don't believe it was all some elaborate act in 'Conviction' when he gives the speech about changing the place, I think he meant it. And we saw the great lengths he went to attempting to make that dream a reality. It fits with Angel's character that he believes he can change something, he never gives up on lost souls because he believes everyone's capable of change. I see no reason why this line of thinking wouldn't play a little part in how he viewed the Wolfram and Hart situation. And he's not the only one, the whole time believed it somewhat.

kana
21-08-08, 07:45 AM
Waht I find interesting is the parallell between Jasmine and Angel. Jasmine was presented as the enemy to be defeated but from her angle she was violating free will because she felt that mankind would suffer a terrible fate without it.

In the scene in Home Angel actually relates to her. He echos what Connor says about Jasmine wanting to give the world everything, whether they deserved it or not. Angel wanted to do the same thing for his son.

Interestingly Angel when talking to Jasmine argues that our fate has to be our own otherwise we are nothing. She argued why are these abstract principles so important that you would want people to suffer.

We have to look a little deeper. Maybe on some level the High Priest was right, part of Angel's motivation is to get Jasmine out of the way so he can have a relationship with Connor but ultimately he gave him up to give him the life he believed he deserved. There is a personal undertone here that goes beyond morality and it started before the episode Home.

Connor argued that you can't be saved by a lie. Aside from the nihilistic suicidal tendencies, he actually stays true to Angel's existential roots. Angel actually contradicts most of what he has been fighting for over the years. He actually robs Connor of his chance of redemption. Angel assumes that he cannot be saved by the usual method of not giving up. He was actually right when he said Connor isn't dead, but in a way Angel kills him. Our memories are part of what makes us and by taking that away we can essentially become someone else. One wonders whether he could have gone to W&H and tried to work with Connor. Spend millions on councilling etc. Working saving him without destroying who he is. Arguably if we understand why Angel couldn't take that risk then we can understand Jasmine a little better and to be honest, in this scenario, I can definitely relate to the 'hero' and the 'villain.

vampmogs
21-08-08, 07:57 AM
Great connections there Kana, magnificent post I loved reading it :)

I think it's a rather sensitive subject and I'm probably sure to fail at articulating what I'm trying to express here but I feel it's somewhat different with Angel in that he was trying to change on person and not everybody. Now I know that sounds silly, but Angel was targeting one person specifically whom he was aware of all the problems Connor had. Jasmine opted to eliminate everyone's free will, including all of those healthy well adjusted people as well as the not so healthy. Angel tried to help one sick person, Jasmine wanted to control everyone. Now I really guess it depends on your own perspective, because Jasmine believed we were all incapable of living on our own free will, whereas Angel believed this only about Connor, I agree with Angel and not with Jasmine.

And I guess it’s just the effect they had on those people. As miserable as they were after Jasmine’s spell was broken, ultimately they were all grateful it had been. Connor tells Angel he’s grateful for having put the spell on him in the first place, so Connor believes it actually helped him whereas everyone else believed Jasmine did the opposite. I think the subject’s own perspective and outlook is important here.

There was also somewhat of self gain in Jasmine’s plan. Whilst I do believe she generally wanted to help people I think in large part, she was motivated by the desire to be needed and loved. She loved the idea of a temple, it finally crept through all her nobleness until finally she just said it. I think she showed her true colours in that moment. That and the fact she gave up on helping humanity the moment her spell was broken and everyone saw her for whom she really was. It’s similar to what Angel went through in the Hyperion in the 1950’s, but unlike Angel Jasmine had someone there who offered support and she still didn’t take it, she opted for mass murder instead. Angel never did this to Connor because he wanted the gratitude or to be loved, his motivation was to get Connor away from him, and when the spell was broken Angel still wanted to help Connor.

kana
22-08-08, 08:01 AM
Great connections there Kana, magnificent post I loved reading it :)

Thanks, as always cheque is in the post.

I think it's a rather sensitive subject and I'm probably sure to fail at articulating what I'm trying to express here but I feel it's somewhat different with Angel in that he was trying to change on person and not everybody. Now I know that sounds silly, but Angel was targeting one person specifically whom he was aware of all the problems Connor had.

Well here is where it is different and it keeps within the theme of Angel being an individualistic soul saver rather than being focused on the utilitarian scale of the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, just look at the Trial.

Jasmine opted to eliminate everyone's free will, including all of those healthy well adjusted people as well as the not so healthy. Angel tried to help one sick person, Jasmine wanted to control everyone. Now I really guess it depends on your own perspective, because Jasmine believed we were all incapable of living on our own free will, whereas Angel believed this only about Connor, I agree with Angel and not with Jasmine.

Well Jasmine was looking at it at a larger scale. Of many of us in the western world reap the benefit of others misfortune. We live in world that is ultimately unfair. And even in the developed countries we suffer dissatisfaction.

As we are seeing now in Ats Jasmine hasn't been proven wrong. Sure it's localised but who knows when the world will become a candy land where all our dreams will become true.

The world (well in the verse by any measure) is moving toward entropy and degredation but Angel at el are not willing to make it better at the expense of free will but even Angel wasn't sure if mankind can save itself but he was willing to give them a shot. Which makes me wonder, why was Angel so 'either or' when it came to Connor? Is it simply a case of death or living the lie? Could Angel not have tried longer than five minutes with his son? Of course he should have controlled the situation but is the assumption that Connor could not be saved so different than the assumption Jasmine made about mankind overall? So far Jasmine has been proven more or less right hasn't she? If it can argued that the other way, surely it can be with Connor as well...

And I guess it’s just the effect they had on those people. As miserable as they were after Jasmine’s spell was broken, ultimately they were all grateful it had been. Connor tells Angel he’s grateful for having put the spell on him in the first place, so Connor believes it actually helped him whereas everyone else believed Jasmine did the opposite. I think the subject’s own perspective and outlook is important here.

But in Origin he has the choice of whether he can be grateful. He has to live the pain of what he has done and try to move on. In essence Angel took his chance of redemption away from him, but I agree it depends on how one views it but philosophically speaking we have the concept of Connor being qualitively different with his new memories. While we all change as our experience grows it's distinctly different than forcibly changing someone. Original Connor believed you can't be saved by a lie. He was essentially right because Angel effectively destroyed the old Connor for a new Connor. I'm a bit behind with the comics but I'd like to see more backlash from the mindwipe and Connor's relationship Angel. I still believe there is more to happen, more to be explored.

There was also somewhat of self gain in Jasmine’s plan. Whilst I do believe she generally wanted to help people I think in large part, she was motivated by the desire to be needed and loved. She loved the idea of a temple, it finally crept through all her nobleness until finally she just said it. I think she showed her true colours in that moment. That and the fact she gave up on helping humanity the moment her spell was broken and everyone saw her for whom she really was. It’s similar to what Angel went through in the Hyperion in the 1950’s, but unlike Angel Jasmine had someone there who offered support and she still didn’t take it, she opted for mass murder instead. Angel never did this to Connor because he wanted the gratitude or to be loved, his motivation was to get Connor away from him, and when the spell was broken Angel still wanted to help Connor.

I agree that at the very least Jasmine had a temper on her, but there is a possiblity that Jasmine couldn't stomach the prospect of mankind trying to make it on their own, believing that they will invaribly live in misery. However, yes, I too believe there was an element of egotism in the proceedings, however I never argued that Angel did what he did for selfish reasons.

buffyholic
11-09-08, 11:51 AM
I believe Angel did the right thing for Connor. Connor was in a place of despair, suffering and anguish and he was ready to kill himself. Angel knew that the deal with W&H was the only way for his son to have a normal life, without any memories of the past. The final scene of "Home" is just so sad, with Angel looking in and let´s face it, what kind of life would Angel offer Connor? He did the right thing. I think that, by the end of S4 Angel was in a place of total despair, he lost himself.

assydingo
26-09-08, 01:54 AM
I would choose my child. However I would not hate my best friend for trying to save my son. Except if I knew it'd mean he'd have a very hot and dark relationship with a girl like Lilah. Then maybe.

Skytteflickan88
30-09-08, 12:57 PM
Was Connor dying? Season 4 is really not my favorite season, so my memory is a bit fuzzy.

If I assume that Connor wasn't dying, just seriosuly screwed up I say DON'T GO TO THE EVIL GUYS!

1. Try therapy with your child, since repressing memories (and other qualities, as mentioned in origin, Connor wasn't suppose to find older women attractive any longer) can come back and bite you. Connor didn't freak out in Origin, but he might have well have reverted to the lost child we saw in season 3&4.
2. Taking away the memories from your "friends" is not good. It's selfish. I understand that them remembering Jasmine couldn't be pleasant, but they should have had the choice.
3. Did Connors new family choose to have a new family member? Did anyone explain to the children that they were going to have their memories and feelings (I assume that some affection-spell was needed) changed. Did Angel care?

Nina
30-09-08, 01:37 PM
You make some great points about the negative sides of the spell, but I think that Connor was far past the moment he could be helped by therapy. The boy was trying to blow himself up.

vampmogs
30-09-08, 02:13 PM
And dealt with things therapists will be ill-equipped to deal with. What therapist could help him deal with growing up in a hell dimension?

Nina
30-09-08, 02:19 PM
I expect that there are some; since we know W&H, we found out that they have a person for everything. But I doubt that you should send your crazy and superpowerful son to a W&H therapist. :err:

vampmogs
30-09-08, 02:23 PM
I expect that there are some; since we know W&H, we found out that they have a person for everything. But I doubt that you should send your crazy and superpowerful son to a W&H therapist. :err:

:roll: Agreed! But yeah I think Connor was beyond help at this point. And I think it goes deeper than that, I think Angel just wanted to give him the life he deserved and never got a chance to have because of Holtz as a result of Angel's own past. Connor was a victim of Angelus' crimes and the people they effected, and I think Angel hated that, it was a way of giving Connor a second chance

Kold
30-09-08, 02:29 PM
Connor argued that you can't be saved by a lie. Aside from the nihilistic suicidal tendencies, he actually stays true to Angel's existential roots. Angel actually contradicts most of what he has been fighting for over the years. He actually robs Connor of his chance of redemption. Angel assumes that he cannot be saved by the usual method of not giving up. He was actually right when he said Connor isn't dead, but in a way Angel kills him. Our memories are part of what makes us and by taking that away we can essentially become someone else. One wonders whether he could have gone to W&H and tried to work with Connor. Spend millions on councilling etc. Working saving him without destroying who he is. Arguably if we understand why Angel couldn't take that risk then we can understand Jasmine a little better and to be honest, in this scenario, I can definitely relate to the 'hero' and the 'villain.

I'd like to highlight this point by Kana.

Forgetting the life that Connor had had to go through, and the hypotheticals and counterfactuals regarding whether or not therapy would have worked, Angel is a show about Angel and his redemption, one step/individual at a time. Home represents the fallout from the ultimate utopia/dystopia. It was a beautiful world, of braindead joy and subservience, but what happens if you're unfortunate enough to be Winston Smith? Through season 4, Angel fixated upon Cordelia and her tantalising apocalypse... potentially, he could save everybody. And in Peace Out, he either saved or ruined innumerable lives, whichever way you want to look at it. The polar opposites of the dark and light that Angel went through in season 4 (from the grim horror of The Beast [the most generic horror episode of the series, Habeus Corpus], a false-faced Cordelia and his own inner darkness to the glory of Jasmine... just look at the juxtaposition between Inside Out and Shiny Happy People) so confused and battered him that Home was his defeat. Home was Angel giving up. It took the whole of season 5 for Angel to muddle through his complete defeat and engineer Not Fade Away.

Angel gave up on his mission, on saving people one problem at a time, by joining Wolfram and Hart. What did he think was going to happen? Did he really think that this was the reward? The sign that he had so changed the world that he was now given one of the predominant machines of evil to turn to the world's good? He couldn't have been that naive. He certainly hadn't Shanshu-ed. This was no reward from the Powers That Be, if anything, he should be totally disillusioned from the Powers That Be after Cordelia/Jasmine. The Wolfram and Hart decision was Angel giving up on the mission.

On the same thread, by cutting the deal he did Angel gave up on his son. He gave up on his potential as a father, and in so doing gave up on the two most miraculous or magical things that had happened to him in the course of the series:
The first, Darla with his son's soul, taking her own life to produce their child.
The second, Cordelia agreeing to become part-demon for her love for him, and inevitably becoming a being of light.
Of course, both of these were engineered by Jasmine, you might say. This surely would have tainted them and thus the miracle of Connor in Angel's eyes... was he really Angel and Darla's son or just Jasmine's? But if Angel devalued Darla and Cordelia's acts by Jasmine's control over the circumstance, he was giving up on his mission again, by failing to see that the decisions were made by them and that the miracle lay in their goodness -- not the consequences of their decisions.

That's the point of Angel. The good in people and the redemption they can find in a single choice and a single act of kindness. Angel erased his son's chance at redemption and also erased his own by giving up on his son... that's what Cordelia specifically pointed out in You're Welcome -- that Angel had lost the mission, and not only betrayed his friends but himself by removing Connor to another life.

By the particular circumstance, perhaps it was easier for Angel to do what he did for Connor... on the other hand, by the themes of the show, it was a betrayal and an admission of defeat.

Nina
30-09-08, 02:36 PM
But didn't he save Connor's soul by doing this? Angel gave up his mission to save Connor's soul.

Connor is probably one of the 'best' persons in either show by now. A boy that loves to save people and without dark sides. He is redeeming himself. That is because Angel saved him. Of course it wasn't in Angel's plan ... but the soul saving was part of Angel's plan. Connor became a nice guy with good grates who is a great son for his parents ...

Kold
30-09-08, 02:47 PM
But is he really Angel's son anymore? Angel decided to completely reinvent Connor, not to redeem Connor. And at the same time as destroying his son, who may have been a horrific and horrified person was still the miracle borne of him and Darla, he gave up his own chance at redemption. He may as well have signed away his Shanshu then.

Angel is so Puritanical. Hard work and a good dose of suffering will save his soul. He told Jasmine that people had to make their own choices and suffer their own fates, even if they made things worse for themselves on their own. He then took away Connor's capacity for suffering and redemption. He also did so by putting Connor's mind and soul at the mercy of a Wolfram and Hart spell.

Even when Connor got his old memories back they could suppressed under his fake memories. He said they were something like dreams in Not Fade Away. Although he forgave Angel for his actions in that episode, he is unable to completely redeem himself because he is no longer the same person anymore. Perhaps not such a bad thing... but an atrocity and betrayal of self by Angel.

Nina
30-09-08, 03:00 PM
I agree that Connor changed and that you could say that he isn't longer Angel's son (although I think that the Connor we see in ATF is Angel's son) ... but that doesn't change the fact that his soul was saved by Angel. Connor was probably not capable anymore of redeeming himself, the chance that he would kill himself was too big. Of course Angel could take the risk, but he decided to give up his son and to save the soul of the boy. And yes, it was against his own believings but I don't think that this was the moment that he should give up his own job, which isn't a quest to find redemption but a quest to help people. He did help Connor, he took away Connor's pain.

"All I wanna do is help. I wanna help because - I don't think people should suffer, as they do."

Saving Connor was his last save.


I don't say that this was the greatest way of fixing things, but I do think that it was the best option of many really bad options.